Most of the Middle Ages was pre-printing press. Until the second half of the fifteenth century, everything had to be written by hand. No printing, not even laser jets, no copy machines, only people writing or copying onto parchment or (by the fourteenth century) paper. Understandably, there were far fewer books and documents than we have now. This makes the loss over the centuries very noticeable.
Some medieval records we know only because the author's original manuscript (improbably) survives. Others we know because the work was copied many times, such as the Arthurian stories I've previously discussed. Property transactions at monasteries are known primarily if the records of these transactions were copied into cartularies.
It was not only the passage of time, with inevitable decay and fading, that did in medieval manuscripts. Fire or flood will destroy parchment. So will rats, who find parchment tasty good. But the biggest losses were caused by humans. Medieval bookbinders used old manuscripts in their bindings, a handy (free!) source of parchment. The Wars of Religion in the sixteenth century destroyed many medieval records. In France, the French Revolution of the eighteenth century destroyed many more, as these records were seen as oppressive tools of the ancien régime that was being overthrown. Documents that survived into the twentieth century were sometimes destroyed during the two world wars.
And then a number of people set out deliberately to destroy medieval manuscripts. They didn't do so with destruction per se on their minds, but due to seeing these manuscripts as sort of random pieces of interesting material, to be used or sold or recombined in ways to please the owners. For example, there was a fad in the nineteenth century of carefully cutting out decorated initials from medieval manuscripts and gluing them to white paper, then framing them as attractive decorations.
Liturgical manuscripts especially, those which had been done with great care and artistry, were especially prone to such mutilation. Even if the initials were not actually cut out, individual leaves might be separated from the rest of the book and sold individually. Rare book dealers realized that they could make far more money selling individual leaves of medieval manuscripts than selling the entire book to one person.
A recent interesting example is the Beauvais missal. It is a liturgical manuscript, highly decorated, which exists as a partial volume. Recently a number of individual leaves, separated in the nineteenth or twentieth centuries, have come to light, most in individual hands. Some were picked up at an estate sale, where the deceased's heirs thought an attractive late medieval sheet of parchment ought to be worth something. Lisa Fagin Davis, director of the Medieval Academy of America, has been on a mission to identify as many of these missing leaves as possible. This is what one of the missing leaves looked like.
I've had folks selling individual medieval manuscript leaves tell me, "Well, the leaves were already separated from the book when I got them." I consider this similar to, "Well, the leopard was already dead when I made its fur into a coat."
It's disconcerting how limited our collection of medieval manuscripts must be compared to those that existed 500 years ago.
© C. Dale Brittain 2022
For more on manuscripts, writing, and other aspects of medieval history, see my ebook Positively Medieval, available on Amazon and other ebook platforms. Also available as a paperback.
No comments:
Post a Comment