Although Cluny and Cîteaux, as I have discussed earlier, are now the best known French monasteries of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, there were plenty of other houses, not associated with either of these great monasteries, where the monks tried to follow a pure life, and where laypeople came seeking prayers for their relatives and themselves.
One of the most significant of these was Fontevraud, founded in the early twelfth century in the west of France, on the border between Anjou and Poitou. It was patronized by great kings, including Henry II of England and his wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine, who had already been queen of France before marrying Henry.
The above is Eleanor's tomb at Fontevraud. (It was added well after her death.)
But Fontevraud had a distinctly non-royal origin. It was founded by a man named Robert of Arbrissel (c. 1045-1116), so-called because he came from the village of Arbrissel, in Brittany. He joined the church as a young man and became a priest.
He was very interested, as were many other well-educated men in the eleventh century, in trying to find a life that matched that of the early apostles. In his early 50s he retreated to the forest of Craon, near his home village, to become a hermit. There were actually quite a few hermits there already, men living alone, devoting their days to prayer and contemplation, living from offerings of people who came to seek their wisdom and from small vegetable gardens.
It would be difficult being a hermit. On the one hand one didn't want to starve, and thus pilgrims bringing small offerings were good. On the other hand, how can a hermit focus on spiritual matters if people keep showing up and asking all sorts of things?
Robert, because of his learning and wisdom, soon attracted a following, and disciples began assembling around him. In essence, his hermitage became a monastery. And with his disciples around him seeking his spiritual insights, Robert seems to have decided within a year that his real vocation was in preaching, spreading God's word. The pope was visiting France, and he gave Robert an official "license to preach." For the next twenty years, until his death, Robert wandered around, preaching and gathering followers.
He appealed especially to women. He would come into town, preaching God's word, and when he left, a number of women would go with him. Now without modern forms of entertainment and communication, a wandering preacher was much more exciting at the beginning of the twelfth century than it is now. And one can certainly see that women would have been intrigued by the possibility of leaving a dreary life behind. But walking cross country, living on hand-outs, and sleeping in fields was not going to be "fun" for long. The women kept on, at least some of them, convinced they were drawing closer to God.
The bishops were distraught. What was this old guy doing, wandering around with a lot of women? One bishop accused him of looking like the village idiot, going barefoot and dressed in shabby clothes. He even accused him of practicing some strange exercise in self-control, in which a man would deliberately sleep next to women without any sexual activity, to test their ability to resist temptation: but, he said, this never worked, "as the cries of babies show us, if you get my drift." He told Robert that he had to found a nunnery and put all these women in it.
Robert rather reluctantly established the monastery of Fontevraud in 1101 for the women. But it was not just for women. Under the authority of one woman, an abbess, there was a house for women, a house for men, and a leprosy, a house for lepers. Fontevraud immediately became known for its holiness of life, which is why it gained so much attention in the following generations, including from kings and queens. The bishop expected Robert would stay there, but he kept right on wandering and preaching. He would promise to stay put "this time" and head right out again as soon as the bishop's back was turned. His followers considered him a saint after his death, for his humility and holy wisdom, but he has never officially become a saint, probably because of his failure to follow the rules.
The monastery is still there, all the different components surrounded by a long wall, though it is now a museum, without monks or nuns or lepers. The former leper house is now a luxury hotel.
Two "lives" of Robert were written shortly after his death by men who had known him, translated into English by Bruce L. Venarde, as Robert of Arbrissel: A Medieval Religious Life (Catholic University Press, 2003).
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
For more on monasticism and other aspects of medieval history, see my ebook, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers. Also available in paperback.
Monday, June 15, 2020
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Know Your Self Publishing
I've got a new book! It's called "Know Your Self Publishing: Everything You Wished You Knew Before Publishing." This one's different from what I've published before. It's helpful tips for independent publishing. I figure a lot of people who read my blog would like to become published authors themselves, so I've compiled some ideas to get you underway.
"Reports! Sales! Royalties! Book Reviews! And what about all those pirates trying to steal my book?
There's a lot for the new self-publishing author to keep track of. Here an experienced self-publisher answers many of the questions that keep coming up, even questions someone may not even have known to ask, in a light-hearted Q&A format." That's the book description.
Here's the link on Amazon, available either as an ebook or a paperback. It's aimed particularly at those self-publishing through Amazon's KDP program for ebooks and paperbacks (it stands for Kindle Direct Publishing). These days, ebooks by "indies" (independent publishers) sell far better than paperbacks, but you can do either.
The key is that an indie isn't just a writer. She also has to be a publisher, meaning she has to understand sales figures, how royalties are calculated and paid, how to have the book reviewed, and how to make sure people even know your book exists. Many say that writing the book is far easier than becoming the publisher.
So these are the issues my new book addresses. I haven't talked about formatting, which is a major issue in itself, but which a lot of other guides address. Amazon KDP has step by step instructions for getting your book formatted and ready to publish. I also touch only in passing on marketing and advertising.
But the book addresses concerns that new publishers often have, which don't seem to have obvious answers when they look around, such as How many books can I expect to sell? or If I publish my book will other people steal it? or Why won't Amazon let Mom write a glowing review of my new book? or Will Fred's Corner Bookstore carry my book? Even Can I quit my day job? (short answer, no). It's about 100 pages long, available as an ebook that can be read on your computer, a tablet, a Kindle, or your phone.
Edit:
I've updated the cover. The new one, done by Brad, is shown below. Which one do you like best?
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
![Know Your Self Publishing: Things You Wished You Knew Before Publishing by [C. Dale Brittain]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41xZx0HWfML.jpg)
"Reports! Sales! Royalties! Book Reviews! And what about all those pirates trying to steal my book?
There's a lot for the new self-publishing author to keep track of. Here an experienced self-publisher answers many of the questions that keep coming up, even questions someone may not even have known to ask, in a light-hearted Q&A format." That's the book description.
Here's the link on Amazon, available either as an ebook or a paperback. It's aimed particularly at those self-publishing through Amazon's KDP program for ebooks and paperbacks (it stands for Kindle Direct Publishing). These days, ebooks by "indies" (independent publishers) sell far better than paperbacks, but you can do either.
The key is that an indie isn't just a writer. She also has to be a publisher, meaning she has to understand sales figures, how royalties are calculated and paid, how to have the book reviewed, and how to make sure people even know your book exists. Many say that writing the book is far easier than becoming the publisher.
So these are the issues my new book addresses. I haven't talked about formatting, which is a major issue in itself, but which a lot of other guides address. Amazon KDP has step by step instructions for getting your book formatted and ready to publish. I also touch only in passing on marketing and advertising.
But the book addresses concerns that new publishers often have, which don't seem to have obvious answers when they look around, such as How many books can I expect to sell? or If I publish my book will other people steal it? or Why won't Amazon let Mom write a glowing review of my new book? or Will Fred's Corner Bookstore carry my book? Even Can I quit my day job? (short answer, no). It's about 100 pages long, available as an ebook that can be read on your computer, a tablet, a Kindle, or your phone.
Edit:
I've updated the cover. The new one, done by Brad, is shown below. Which one do you like best?
![Know Your Self Publishing: Things You Wished You Knew Before Publishing by [C. Dale Brittain]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51my+JVVFUL.jpg)
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
Monday, June 8, 2020
Alaric the Goth
Medievalists have embraced Late Antiquity. This is the period, roughly third or fourth century AD to the seventh or eighth century, that might be seen as lying between Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Classicists, those who study ancient Greece and Rome, cover lots of fields, language and literature, art, and archaeology, as well as ancient history. Usually they lose interest around the fourth century, once the Roman Empire's capital moved from Rome to Constantinople (modern Istanbul) and the Empire became officially Christian. So medievalists have taken up Late Antiquity and reconceptualized it, not as the era of the "fall of Rome" but rather as the beginning of the Middle Ages.
After all, medieval society is generally seen as developing from a mix of Roman culture, Germanic culture, and Christianity, so we might as well embrace the centuries where those got all mixed together.
One of the major figures in Late Antiquity was Alaric the Goth. The Goths were a Germanic people who had lived at the eastern edges of the Roman Empire and had been wandering in during the fourth century. The Romans had recruited a number of their young men into their armies. The Goths were not an organized "tribe" but rather a large group of people who shared a lot of language and culture. There were two main subgroups, the Visigoths (meaning western Goths) and Ostrogoths (meaning, as you probably already guessed, eastern Goths.) In the late fourth century, the Visigoths lived in the Balkans.
(And no, the Goths did not wear heavy eye makeup and black fingernail polish. They also had nothing to do with Gothic architecture. One word, many meanings.)
And here we meet Alaric of the Visigoths (c. 375-411). He was recruited into the Roman army as a young man and helped the Romans defeat the Franks, another Germanic tribe (which eventually settled in the Empire, in what is now called France for them, but that's another story). He did not receive the accolades and rewards he felt he had been promised and left the army. But he gained a high position nonetheless in becoming king of the Visigoths in 395. (Guess Rome was showed!) (You note he's still only about twenty. This is a world of young men.)
The above is a nineteenth-century German picture of what Alaric might have looked like. Because he was Germanic, the nineteenth-century Germans liked him, as they tried to assemble a national identity.
He and his people were recognized by Rome but not given much respect. A recent author has tried to draw parallels between the Goths being treated as second-class by Italians, and modern African-Americans being discriminated against by mainstream American culture, but I think he's overdoing it (though I'm glad he's concerned about modern African-Americans). The leaders of the Roman Empire treated everybody like that. They were a slave society. Anyone who wasn't them was considered a lower being.
So I wouldn't call Alaric's concern a desire for his civil rights. After all, he spent most of his years as king plundering Roman territory. He had seen how wealthy the Romans were, and he went from plundering Greece to plundering Italy. It's an incredibly complicated story, involving rival emperors, imperial usurpers, treaties made and broken, ransoms promised and reneged on. It puts Game of Thrones to shame. It didn't help the Romans in the long run that they captured and killed a lot of the wives and children of the Goths during some of the wars' twists and turns.
In 410 Alaric and his Goths decided to sack the city of Rome itself. This was as you can imagine a shock to the citizens of Rome. The city had not been effectively attacked for half a millennium. But the Goths came through and seized everything that wasn't nailed down. One of the prizes Alaric took with him was the emperor's sister (who eventually married Alaric's brother, but that's another story.)
Above is a nineteenth-century French depiction of the sack of Rome. Visigoths are preparing to topple a Roman statue. It's unclear why they've decided to do so in the nude.
Now this was not the "fall of Rome." Several years later the city had rebuilt so successfully that Romans boasted you could hardly tell anything had happened. There continued to be, at least intermittently, Roman emperors in Rome, as well as the main emperors in Constantinople, for several more generations.
Alaric himself did not survive a year after the sack of Rome, dying probably of a fever. The story is that a stream was diverted from its course, and he was buried in the stream bed with suitable amounts of loot, and then the stream was allowed back into its banks, to conceal his final resting spot. To be sure, the slaves who had done the digging were all executed.
But the Visigoths, carrying lots of excellent loot, headed west, eventually settling in southern France and the Spanish peninsula, which was also part of the Roman Empire. They had picked up a variant of Christianity, Arianism (officially a heresy, it denies the divinity of Christ, calling Jesus just an inspired teacher). There they ruled until the rise of Islam two centuries later.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
For more on medieval social and political history, see my book, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers, either as an ebook or in print.
After all, medieval society is generally seen as developing from a mix of Roman culture, Germanic culture, and Christianity, so we might as well embrace the centuries where those got all mixed together.
One of the major figures in Late Antiquity was Alaric the Goth. The Goths were a Germanic people who had lived at the eastern edges of the Roman Empire and had been wandering in during the fourth century. The Romans had recruited a number of their young men into their armies. The Goths were not an organized "tribe" but rather a large group of people who shared a lot of language and culture. There were two main subgroups, the Visigoths (meaning western Goths) and Ostrogoths (meaning, as you probably already guessed, eastern Goths.) In the late fourth century, the Visigoths lived in the Balkans.
(And no, the Goths did not wear heavy eye makeup and black fingernail polish. They also had nothing to do with Gothic architecture. One word, many meanings.)
And here we meet Alaric of the Visigoths (c. 375-411). He was recruited into the Roman army as a young man and helped the Romans defeat the Franks, another Germanic tribe (which eventually settled in the Empire, in what is now called France for them, but that's another story). He did not receive the accolades and rewards he felt he had been promised and left the army. But he gained a high position nonetheless in becoming king of the Visigoths in 395. (Guess Rome was showed!) (You note he's still only about twenty. This is a world of young men.)

The above is a nineteenth-century German picture of what Alaric might have looked like. Because he was Germanic, the nineteenth-century Germans liked him, as they tried to assemble a national identity.
He and his people were recognized by Rome but not given much respect. A recent author has tried to draw parallels between the Goths being treated as second-class by Italians, and modern African-Americans being discriminated against by mainstream American culture, but I think he's overdoing it (though I'm glad he's concerned about modern African-Americans). The leaders of the Roman Empire treated everybody like that. They were a slave society. Anyone who wasn't them was considered a lower being.
So I wouldn't call Alaric's concern a desire for his civil rights. After all, he spent most of his years as king plundering Roman territory. He had seen how wealthy the Romans were, and he went from plundering Greece to plundering Italy. It's an incredibly complicated story, involving rival emperors, imperial usurpers, treaties made and broken, ransoms promised and reneged on. It puts Game of Thrones to shame. It didn't help the Romans in the long run that they captured and killed a lot of the wives and children of the Goths during some of the wars' twists and turns.
In 410 Alaric and his Goths decided to sack the city of Rome itself. This was as you can imagine a shock to the citizens of Rome. The city had not been effectively attacked for half a millennium. But the Goths came through and seized everything that wasn't nailed down. One of the prizes Alaric took with him was the emperor's sister (who eventually married Alaric's brother, but that's another story.)
Above is a nineteenth-century French depiction of the sack of Rome. Visigoths are preparing to topple a Roman statue. It's unclear why they've decided to do so in the nude.
Now this was not the "fall of Rome." Several years later the city had rebuilt so successfully that Romans boasted you could hardly tell anything had happened. There continued to be, at least intermittently, Roman emperors in Rome, as well as the main emperors in Constantinople, for several more generations.
Alaric himself did not survive a year after the sack of Rome, dying probably of a fever. The story is that a stream was diverted from its course, and he was buried in the stream bed with suitable amounts of loot, and then the stream was allowed back into its banks, to conceal his final resting spot. To be sure, the slaves who had done the digging were all executed.
But the Visigoths, carrying lots of excellent loot, headed west, eventually settling in southern France and the Spanish peninsula, which was also part of the Roman Empire. They had picked up a variant of Christianity, Arianism (officially a heresy, it denies the divinity of Christ, calling Jesus just an inspired teacher). There they ruled until the rise of Islam two centuries later.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
For more on medieval social and political history, see my book, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers, either as an ebook or in print.
Friday, May 29, 2020
Revolt of the White Caps
Popular movements, social revolts, heresies: it is really hard to distinguish them for the Middle Ages. It used to be that historians would see all heresies as social revolts in disguise, dismissing the religious aspect as just a facade. That of course is not true, but it would be equally wrong to think of the heresies which became popular movements--as many did--as animated only by spiritual concerns.
This brings us to the White Caps, a religious/social movement of the 1180s. It started in the town of Le Puy, in the Auvergne, a city built on a series of volcanic cones. A man named Durand had a vision of the Virgin, who is the patron saint of Le Puy.
This brings us to the White Caps, a religious/social movement of the 1180s. It started in the town of Le Puy, in the Auvergne, a city built on a series of volcanic cones. A man named Durand had a vision of the Virgin, who is the patron saint of Le Puy.
This is the town today. On top of the highest peak you can glimpse a nneteenth-century statue of the Virgin.
Anyway, in Durand's vision in the 1180s he was told to form a group of faithful people who would all adopt a lead badge with the Virgin's image on it and a white cap or hood. Both lords and peasants joined the group, with the goal of bringing "peace" to the region, in part by attacking bandits who were interfering with local trade. Durand's group was known as the capucciati because of their caps.
Several chroniclers recorded the events at the time, all giving slightly different versions. One said that the vision that began it was nothing but an "imposture," and that the greedy merchants of Le Puy just wanted an easier time transporting their goods. Most however credited the group with real religious devotion.
The movement quickly spread north into Burgundy and became established in the region around Auxerre. Here, the chroniclers all agreed, the movement changed, and the peasants and villagers turned on the lords who had once been part of their group, saying they were all bandits themselves. At this point the bishop of Auxerre, recently consecrated, became involved.
Bishop Hugh rode out, heavily armed, with his men and rounded up all the White Caps folks he could find. He took away their caps and their badges, saying they had forgotten that "the wages of sin are servitude" and they were all sinners and serfs, and that the Bible says that serfs should not attack their lords (the Bible actually says "the wages of sin are death" and talked about slaves, not medieval serfs, but this was close enough for the bishop).
He told the defeated White Caps that, to punish them, they would not be able to wear any hat at all for a year, either to shelter them from the bright sun during harvest or to keep the snow off in the winter. The bishop's uncle, the archbishop of Sens, however saw the men roasting in the harvest fields, had pity, and told Bishop Hugh to let them wear regular hats again.
This short-lived revolt has several interesting features. One is that it demonstrates peasant agency, the ability of people who are usually thought of as marginal and oppressed to fight back against oppression, as I have discussed earlier. It also shows that what might be considered a social revolt, an effort by peasants to claim that all lords were, in some form, bandits, would take on a distinctly religious tone in the Middle Ages. The capucciati were not an actual heresy, because they were not espousing erroneous doctrine, but a religious impulse clearly started their movement. It is also important to note that bishops were not always in agreement with each other, and that many bishops, like Bishop Hugh of Auxerre, felt that they were a better judge of real religion than other people, and were prepared for armed conflict to prove it.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
For more on medieval religion and society, see my ebook, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers. Also available in paperback!
For more on medieval religion and society, see my ebook, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers. Also available in paperback!
Monday, May 18, 2020
How I Survived Junior High
I've got a new book! It's entitled "How I Survived Junior High" and is available on all the major ebook sites (Amazon, iTunes, Kobo, Nook), and is also available as a paperback.
Those who know me as a fantasy writer will note that this one is short on wizards and dragons or even a medieval (or semi-medieval) setting. It is however "historical fiction," set back some 60 years ago in the US. Like all of my novels, I think of it as "searing," while readers may say, "Gave me a few chuckles." I deny that it is autobiographical.
Here's the description:
Back before cell phones, before computers or streaming video, even before they called it "middle school," life was easier, right? Wrong!
It's the early 1960s. Shelley, shy and twelve years old, leaves a small elementary school for a big junior high. Her experiences are both painful and very funny. Will she be able to make friends? Will the kids in the popular clique even notice her? Which is more obnoxious, her little brother or the school principal? Why is her body changing like this, and will she ever get a date?
And here's the opening:
Those who know me as a fantasy writer will note that this one is short on wizards and dragons or even a medieval (or semi-medieval) setting. It is however "historical fiction," set back some 60 years ago in the US. Like all of my novels, I think of it as "searing," while readers may say, "Gave me a few chuckles." I deny that it is autobiographical.
Here's the description:
Back before cell phones, before computers or streaming video, even before they called it "middle school," life was easier, right? Wrong!
It's the early 1960s. Shelley, shy and twelve years old, leaves a small elementary school for a big junior high. Her experiences are both painful and very funny. Will she be able to make friends? Will the kids in the popular clique even notice her? Which is more obnoxious, her little brother or the school principal? Why is her body changing like this, and will she ever get a date?
And here's the opening:
CHAPTER ONE
I didn't get lost once on the first day of Junior High, even though I had
never been in the building before. I cheated, though. My mother had
taught there before I was born and told me, “Go in the front door, turn right, and your homeroom is at the end of the hall on the left.” And for the rest of the day I just followed the other people in my classes from one room to another. Since they had not gone to a three- room grade school as I had, they could be expected to be able to find their way around a large building.
Homeroom 110 was at the end of the hall, on the left, just as my mother had said. Our bus had been early, and there were only two other people there besides the teacher.
“Hello,” she said as I came in. “Is this your home- room? I’m Mrs. Wilkes.”
“I’m Shelley Langdon,” I answered and smiled. Smile at your teachers, my father had said as I left that morning. Mrs.Wilkes was glancing at a list on her desk. “Shelley is short for Michelle.”
Mrs. Wilkes returned my smile. She had a plump face and smiled just like my favorite aunt.
never been in the building before. I cheated, though. My mother had
taught there before I was born and told me, “Go in the front door, turn right, and your homeroom is at the end of the hall on the left.” And for the rest of the day I just followed the other people in my classes from one room to another. Since they had not gone to a three- room grade school as I had, they could be expected to be able to find their way around a large building.
Homeroom 110 was at the end of the hall, on the left, just as my mother had said. Our bus had been early, and there were only two other people there besides the teacher.
“Hello,” she said as I came in. “Is this your home- room? I’m Mrs. Wilkes.”
“I’m Shelley Langdon,” I answered and smiled. Smile at your teachers, my father had said as I left that morning. Mrs.Wilkes was glancing at a list on her desk. “Shelley is short for Michelle.”
Mrs. Wilkes returned my smile. She had a plump face and smiled just like my favorite aunt.
“Choose any seat you like, Michelle. Make yourself comfortable until everyone is here.”
I took a seat next to the window. Be sure to get a desk with enough light, my father had said. And since our bus had been so early, I had plenty of time to make myself comfortable.
“I wonder what she teaches,” I thought, looking at Mrs. Wilkes. “I wonder if I’ll have her. I wonder if any of the other kids in this homeroom will be in my classes.”
My older brother Jack had gone to junior high on the other side of town before they’d changed the school districts. “Homerooms are alphabetical,” he said, “but your classes depend on how smart you are.” Jack thought he knew everything about junior high, just because he was three years older than I and in high school now. He had ignored me when I said that maybe Sidney Sharpe Junior High was different from his.
Other students were coming in now. “Hey there, Tom!” “Barbie, how you been?” “Did you guys have a good summer?” “Hey, Jamie, we’re in the same room again!” “I had a great summer!”
No one said, “Hi, Shelley!” There was no one in the room from my grade school. I sat up straighter, flipped my long curly hair back over my shoulders, and hid my chewed fingernails under the desk.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
If you came to my blog looking for medieval history rather than fiction, see my ebook, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers. Also available in paperback.
I took a seat next to the window. Be sure to get a desk with enough light, my father had said. And since our bus had been so early, I had plenty of time to make myself comfortable.
“I wonder what she teaches,” I thought, looking at Mrs. Wilkes. “I wonder if I’ll have her. I wonder if any of the other kids in this homeroom will be in my classes.”
My older brother Jack had gone to junior high on the other side of town before they’d changed the school districts. “Homerooms are alphabetical,” he said, “but your classes depend on how smart you are.” Jack thought he knew everything about junior high, just because he was three years older than I and in high school now. He had ignored me when I said that maybe Sidney Sharpe Junior High was different from his.
Other students were coming in now. “Hey there, Tom!” “Barbie, how you been?” “Did you guys have a good summer?” “Hey, Jamie, we’re in the same room again!” “I had a great summer!”
No one said, “Hi, Shelley!” There was no one in the room from my grade school. I sat up straighter, flipped my long curly hair back over my shoulders, and hid my chewed fingernails under the desk.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
If you came to my blog looking for medieval history rather than fiction, see my ebook, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers. Also available in paperback.
Wednesday, May 13, 2020
Prester John
There was a strong belief in the Middle Ages of a mysterious Prester John (the prester meaning priest), a king somewhere in Africa who was a Christian. During most of Europe's Middle Ages sub-Saharan Africa was primarily what they considered pagan (North Africa of course was Muslim from the seventh century on), so the idea of a Christian enclave was very exciting.
This idea may have had its origin in third-hand stories about Ethiopia. That region of east Africa included a large Christian population (the kingdom of Ethiopia had made Christianity the official religion in the fourth century) and a large Jewish population. The latter were descended, according to legend, from the Queen of Sheba, who had married King Solomon. The Prester John of the stories was usually black (like the Ethiopians) and also Christian.
But there was more to the story of Prester John than confused travelers' tales about Ethiopia (or India or Christian Armenia). The story gained wide currency from the (fictive) accounts in a volume called Mandeville's Travels. Mandeville supposedly discovered two great kingdoms, side by side in Africa (or India, or possibly the Middle East, at any rate very far away), one a scary Muslim kingdom of Assassins, the other a beautiful and happy Christian kingdom ruled over by Prester John. In some versions, John was descended from the Three Magi. Thus tales of Prester John, who combined the functions of king and priest, could serve as a foil for all that was supposedly bad about Islam.
The kingdom of Prester John was of course opulent, full of rich jewels, as any imagined wonderful country should be. But John and his nobles lived abstemiously, eating simple fare, having sex only a few times a year and then only for the purpose of procreation. Prester John got to have a harem in these stories, or at least be polygamous like an Old Testament figure, but he rarely visited his wives. Thus the stories about him could also serve as morality stories about what Europe's own monarchs were supposed to be like, as seen in the late medieval image below. The supposed Assassin kingdom next door to Prester John's, in contrast, was full of gluttony and lechery.
It should not be a surprise that stories of Prester John first became popular in the middle of the twelfth century, during the height of the crusading movement. A letter that he supposedly wrote, saying that he wanted to help defend Jerusalem from the Muslims and personally visit the Holy Sepulchre, gained wide circulation in the 1140s. In the 1170s the pope wrote a letter to Prester John, suggesting they should work together, though he doesn't seem to have gotten an answer.
In the early thirteenth century, after the Muslims had taken back Jerusalem, a crusading army made some spectacularly disastrous strategic decisions based on the conviction that Prester John himself (or a son or grandson or nephew for sure) was about to show up with his armies to help them. (As you probably guessed, he didn't.)
The story of Prester John continued to be influential during the late Middle Ages, getting extra impetus when diplomatic relations were established (sort of) with Ethiopia in the fourteenth century. By the seventeenth century, however, Europeans had to admit that perhaps Prester John had not been real after all, and that Ethiopia was not the marvelous jeweled kingdom they'd heard about.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
For more on crusades and legends and other aspects of medieval history, see my ebook, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers. Also available as a paperback.
This idea may have had its origin in third-hand stories about Ethiopia. That region of east Africa included a large Christian population (the kingdom of Ethiopia had made Christianity the official religion in the fourth century) and a large Jewish population. The latter were descended, according to legend, from the Queen of Sheba, who had married King Solomon. The Prester John of the stories was usually black (like the Ethiopians) and also Christian.
But there was more to the story of Prester John than confused travelers' tales about Ethiopia (or India or Christian Armenia). The story gained wide currency from the (fictive) accounts in a volume called Mandeville's Travels. Mandeville supposedly discovered two great kingdoms, side by side in Africa (or India, or possibly the Middle East, at any rate very far away), one a scary Muslim kingdom of Assassins, the other a beautiful and happy Christian kingdom ruled over by Prester John. In some versions, John was descended from the Three Magi. Thus tales of Prester John, who combined the functions of king and priest, could serve as a foil for all that was supposedly bad about Islam.
The kingdom of Prester John was of course opulent, full of rich jewels, as any imagined wonderful country should be. But John and his nobles lived abstemiously, eating simple fare, having sex only a few times a year and then only for the purpose of procreation. Prester John got to have a harem in these stories, or at least be polygamous like an Old Testament figure, but he rarely visited his wives. Thus the stories about him could also serve as morality stories about what Europe's own monarchs were supposed to be like, as seen in the late medieval image below. The supposed Assassin kingdom next door to Prester John's, in contrast, was full of gluttony and lechery.
It should not be a surprise that stories of Prester John first became popular in the middle of the twelfth century, during the height of the crusading movement. A letter that he supposedly wrote, saying that he wanted to help defend Jerusalem from the Muslims and personally visit the Holy Sepulchre, gained wide circulation in the 1140s. In the 1170s the pope wrote a letter to Prester John, suggesting they should work together, though he doesn't seem to have gotten an answer.
In the early thirteenth century, after the Muslims had taken back Jerusalem, a crusading army made some spectacularly disastrous strategic decisions based on the conviction that Prester John himself (or a son or grandson or nephew for sure) was about to show up with his armies to help them. (As you probably guessed, he didn't.)
The story of Prester John continued to be influential during the late Middle Ages, getting extra impetus when diplomatic relations were established (sort of) with Ethiopia in the fourteenth century. By the seventeenth century, however, Europeans had to admit that perhaps Prester John had not been real after all, and that Ethiopia was not the marvelous jeweled kingdom they'd heard about.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
For more on crusades and legends and other aspects of medieval history, see my ebook, Positively Medieval: Life and Society in the Middle Ages, available on Amazon and other e-tailers. Also available as a paperback.
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Gypsies
Gypsies first appeared in western Europe in the late Middle Ages. Although in the US they are considered a fairly intriguing group, in Europe they have been distrusted and considered dangerous ever since they first appeared. The word "gypsy" in English is connected "to gyp," to cheat. British gypsies therefore prefer being called Travelers, because moving from place to place has always been one of their defining characteristics. The best term for them (their own term) is Roma or Romani.
The first records of them are from India in the tenth and eleventh centuries, when there are references to groups who were especially good at music. In the eleventh and twelfth centuries, they began migrating west, from India to Persia to Armenia to Byzantium, the Greek-speaking heir to the Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople. The Greeks called them Atzinganoi, a word that may have meant "heretics" originally, and that has given rise to most of Europe's names for them (Zigeuner in German, Tsiganes in French, Zingari in Italian).
The Romani stayed in Byzantine territory for several centuries, picking up many Greek words to add to a language that had originated in the Indian subcontinent, and gaining the very designation of Romani, people of the "Roman Empire," especially that part now known as Romania. It was during this period that they began to be considered a particular race, a group within Byzantium with distinctive culture, language, religion, and habits: for example, they were described as thieves and also as endowed with strange occult powers, especially fortune-telling.
(Cue Cher's song, "Gypsies, Tramps, and Thieves.")
In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, with the attacks of the Turks on Byzantium (and its eventual fall), many of the Romani moved west again. When they reached England, they were called "Egyptians," probably from a combination of their darker complexion (compared to the Celts and Anglo-Saxons of the British Isles) and of their reputation for sorcery, for Muslim Egypt was also considered a center of dark arts. This is the root of the word English word "gypsy."
The Romani were distrusted, as strange "foreign" people. Some settled down in their own communities in western Europe, but others found it hard to be accepted and found it easiest to keep moving, doing itinerant work (such as being tinkers) or doing animal trading. Few became farmers. In many ways, they were treated similarly to the way the Jews were treated, as a minority with useful skills on which the dominant culture wanted to keep a watchful eye, and against which there were periodic attacks.
Those Romani who stayed in Romania/Moldavia/Transylvania had it even more difficult. The area was considered the breadbasket of the Turkish empire that had replaced the Byzantine empire, and many Romani became agricultural slaves, a condition that persisted until the nineteenth century.
The Romani are still distrusted and treated with prejudice in modern Europe. France forbids parking a camper (the modern replacement for the old gypsy caravan) in a house's driveway, meaning that those who want to spend part of the year following the old itinerant ways have to garage one someplace. (This rule was not written with French vacationers in mind.)
I have included gypsies in some of my fantasies. I call them Romney, with a different spelling to indicate that I am not striving for historical exactness in my fiction. The Romney play an important role in the novella A Long Way Til November, which (unlike some of my other novellas) still has my own original cover, a photo of the French hilltop town of Turenne.
© C. Dale Brittain 2020
For more on medieval society, see my ebook Positively Medieval, available on Amazon and other ebook platforms. Also available in paperback!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



