Medieval people would most certainly not be considered inclusive and welcoming of diversity by today's standards. Anyone who wasn't an orthodox Christian (i.e. not a heretic), or who didn't know how to speak the local language, was treated at best with suspicion. But skin color was not nearly as big a factor as it is in the modern US.
In part this was because western Europe had a great range of skin and hair colors anyway, with more light-skinned blonds in Scandinavia and Celtic areas like Ireland, and more swarthy skin and black hair along the Mediterranean. The Mediterranean had been a melting pot since at least the early days of the Roman Empire, with African, Middle Eastern, and European ethnic groups all intermixing. In the late Empire, a freed slave became a citizen, and his children might marry the descendants of people who had never been slaves. Frescos from ancient Rome show a progressive darkening of Romans' skin over the generations, as more African genes mixed with the original Roman Celtic genes.
Spain and Italy especially had populations that mingled genes from all over the Mediterranean and sub-Saharan Africa, as well as from northern Europe. Think about "Spanish eyes," dark and flashing. They didn't get them from the Visigoths.
So medieval Europeans were happy to deal with people with a great range of skin tones without trying to identify them by "race." Blond and blue-eyed, however, remained the default definition of beauty, as indeed it still is the US—notice how actresses and even TV personalities are far more likely to be blond than the frequency of light hair in the general population would warrant.
Light skin was not just a marker of beauty but a marker of wealth and status. These days, when most people have indoor jobs, getting a tan makes a Caucasian stand out among the pale-skinned. In the Middle Ages, when most of the population was involved in farming and thus were outdoors a lot, having pale skin was good, because it meant you weren't a peasant.
(In the modern US, it seems that getting a tan from a day at the beach or from a tanning salon is good. Getting a tan from your ancestral genes is bad. I don't get it either.)
It was very rare that a European saw a sub-Saharan African, someone with very dark, essentially black skin. They knew however that such people existed. The Romans had mentioned them, and the Queen of Sheba in the Bible was described as "dusky." (It seems most likely that she was from what is now Ethiopia.)
In the medieval story of "Parzival," Parzival father had lived in the Middle East for years with a woman as dark as the Queen of Sheba. He never married her, however, according to the story, not because of her skin color but because she was not a Christian. They had a son who eventually came to Europe and met Parzival, his half-brother. This mixed-race son was described as spotted, black and white.
Medieval people didn't think through where the range of European skin tones had come from. But they knew that if you bred a black and a white cow, or a black and a white horse, you'd get offspring with black and white spots. Humans must be the same. It all made sense.
© C. Dale Brittain 2017
Were chinese or japanese people known in 13th century England? May have they ever meet one?
ReplyDelete